[Qtscript-bindings] Making releases

[Kent Hansen]

I've put up a versioned tarball at
http://code.google.com/p/qtscriptgenerator/downloads/list
which is essentially just a rename of the current Labs snapshot
(http://labs.trolltech.com/gitweb?p=qtscriptgenerator;a=snapshot;h=HEAD;sf=tgz)

Let me know if that solution is(n't) good enough.

Regards,
Kent


Ian Monroe wrote:
> Many Amarok developers are kind of annoyed by how long it takes to
> compile Amarok now that we have the script generator, and I can't
> really blame them. So it'd make sense to have the script bindings in a
> seperate package. Plus this way other projects could just depend on
> the package and use the bindings, since at that point every distro
> with Amarok would have it in a seperate package.
>
> I can think of a few ways to do this:
> * Kent releases a versioned tarball
> * I throw it into kdesupport and make tarballs from there
> * I release a versioned tarball, with the
> http://repo.or.cz/w/qtscriptgenerator.git as the VCS for it
>
> With the last two methods the versions would probably just be matched
> with Amarok version. With the last method I could probably drop the
> cmake files (unless Kent wants to adopt this superior build system,
> hint hint :P).
>
> Ian
> _______________________________________________
> Qtscript-bindings mailing list
> Qtscript-bindings at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/qtscript-bindings
>