[Qtscript-bindings] Making releases

Peter Kümmel syntheticpp at gmx.net
Wed Mar 4 22:34:40 CET 2009


Ian Monroe wrote:
> Many Amarok developers are kind of annoyed by how long it takes to
> compile Amarok now that we have the script generator, and I can't
> really blame them. So it'd make sense to have the script bindings in a
> seperate package. Plus this way other projects could just depend on
> the package and use the bindings, since at that point every distro
> with Amarok would have it in a seperate package.
> 
> I can think of a few ways to do this:
> * Kent releases a versioned tarball
> * I throw it into kdesupport and make tarballs from there
> * I release a versioned tarball, with the
> http://repo.or.cz/w/qtscriptgenerator.git as the VCS for it

Attached a patch with speeds up compilation by several factors.
Here it takes about 5 minutes to build the generator, qtscript_core,
and qtscript_gui, which is much faster.

With the patch one file is generated which includes all the other
.cpp files and only this file is compiled.

I've tested it with msvc and Qt 4.5.0.
The diff is against git://repo.or.cz/qtscriptgenerator/amarok.git

Peter


> 
> With the last two methods the versions would probably just be matched
> with Amarok version. With the last method I could probably drop the
> cmake files (unless Kent wants to adopt this superior build system,
> hint hint :P).
> 
> Ian
> _______________________________________________
> Qtscript-bindings mailing list
> Qtscript-bindings at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/qtscript-bindings
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: merged_files.patch
Url: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/qtscript-bindings/attachments/20090304/000f5a4b/attachment.bat 


More information about the Qtscript-bindings mailing list