[Qtscript-bindings] long qtscript binding load times: easily broken up?

Richard Moore richmoore44 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 10 18:35:31 CEST 2008

On 9/10/08, Ian Monroe <ian at monroe.nu> wrote:
> I was thinking of maybe a combination of breaking up the modules into
> smaller ones and disabling classes that don't sound useful for Amarok
> scripts (and then re-enable them on-request).
> Other solutions? How much should I break up? I could potentially have
> a "each class has its own module." Would this incur a lot of overhead
> loading all these modules or does it not make much difference?

Kent and I discussed this at Akademy, I believe he's already got some
code for a version of the generator that creates bindings that do on
demand loading to remove the overhead.



More information about the Qtscript-bindings mailing list