D12498: Fully remove `Application Name` from Details panel

[Nathaniel Graham]

ngraham added a comment.


  In D12498#278282 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D12498#278282>, @bruns wrote:
  
  > In D12498#272379 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D12498#272379>, @ngraham wrote:
  >
  > > I feel like if we go with "missing", users will blame us and we'll get bug reports ("If it's missing, why can't you provide it? Duh!").
  >
  >
  > Its simple "We can not provide it because upstream was to lazy to read and follow the spec. Please raise a upstream bug report". If we just omit it, we encourage upstream to keep shipping faulty polkit action files.
  
  
  This concept (and the proposed label) is suitable for a developer audience, not a regular user audience.
  
  We have the same issue in Discover when upstreams don't ship enough ApStream metadata. We omit anything that's missing instead of labeling the missing sections with some kind of admonishment to the upstreams. Developers like us should take care of browbeating non-compliant upstream software vendors; we shouldn't push that work onto users.

REPOSITORY
  R121 Policykit (Polkit) KDE Agent

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D12498

To: sharvey, bruns, ngraham, davidedmundson
Cc: davidedmundson, bruns, ngraham, plasma-devel, ragreen, Pitel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20180614/6c820bcd/attachment-0001.html>