Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional
Martin Gräßlin
mgraesslin at kde.org
Wed Jun 1 09:43:36 UTC 2016
> On June 1, 2016, 10:13 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > -2, see also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361954 for explanation why we don't want this.
>
> Pino Toscano wrote:
> Nowhere there is discussed (only briefly mentioned) about support with non-Linux platforms; considering libkscreen is a library used by components (and also external ones, like the display configuration in LxQt), then it makes sense to me making it portable.
>
> Making wayland mandatory in libkscreen (and also in other modules, like plasma-integration, kwin, kscreenlocker) means killing outright any attempt to make Plasma build on non-Linux platforms. Please reconsider this, thanks.
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> which non-Linux platforms which we care about don't have Wayland? Before making KWayland a mandatory dependency in Plasma we did check with distro packagers. Everyone was fine with it.
>
> Pino Toscano wrote:
> At least to my reading of Wayland sources, to build the libraries you need features like signalfd and timerfd, which are non-POSIX and available only on Linux.
>
> Can you please point me to the discussion you had with distro packagers?
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> There are non-linux which have successfully run Weston on a DRM backend. That was in the news a few weeks back, see e.g. http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2016-May/249620.html
>
> So let's go from "theoretically not possible" to "practically not possible". Where is it not possible to have a Wayland dependency?
>
> Concerning the discussion: a quick search showed me https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-distro-packagers/2015-July/000076.html, but there must be an older one already as we use it in plasma-workspace (kscreenlocker) since Plasma 5.2 IIRC. This makes it difficult for me to point you to the discussion as it's really a long time ago.
>
> Bhushan Shah wrote:
> https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2015-July/008725.html
>
> Pino Toscano wrote:
> > https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-distro-packagers/2015-July/000076.html
> > https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2015-July/008725.html
>
> The only party involved there is a Slackware packager, which is a Linux distro (where the Wayland libraries can be built fine). I don't see anyone mentioning non-Linux support.
>
> > There are non-linux which have successfully run Weston on a DRM backend. That was in the news a few weeks back, see e.g. http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2016-May/249620.html
>
> That's the second attempt at this I see (the first one was beginning of 2013 IIRC), yet none of this code as been upstreamed yet.
> I don't see anyone mentioning non-Linux support.
All we can do is ask, sorry.
> That's the second attempt at this I see (the first one was beginning of 2013 IIRC), yet none of this code as been upstreamed yet.
Well I find it strange that I got code from BSD users for new KWin. If it were impossible to build KWin anymore that wouldn't work ;-)
- Martin
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128073/#review96120
-----------------------------------------------------------
On June 1, 2016, 10:10 a.m., Pino Toscano wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128073/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated June 1, 2016, 10:10 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Plasma, Solid, Daniel Vrátil, Martin Gräßlin, and Sebastian Kügler.
>
>
> Repository: libkscreen
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Look for KF5Wayland as optional package, not building all the Wayland-related code (backend, additions to tests, DPMS support in kscreen-doctor) if it is not available.
>
> This allows libkscreen to build again on platforms without Wayland, such as non-Linux or old Linux distros.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> CMakeLists.txt 9c834d9500fa0b89764516464bd58e835671977b
> autotests/CMakeLists.txt 2c8ee3d2021b1222072d6a1faafaff1b336d27e3
> backends/CMakeLists.txt 3563e138454edcc0c874237745123b09077d067c
> src/doctor/CMakeLists.txt 7294d88af127a6604bc7e48e16342c93f152de8c
> src/doctor/doctor.cpp a156f006212e63c155a6f643929d0a5880275731
> tests/CMakeLists.txt 1489d21383e13cd1431a81d48b4a272c28302041
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128073/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Builds fine.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pino Toscano
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20160601/4343c483/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Plasma-devel
mailing list