kded5 and kde-workspace
Àlex Fiestas
afiestas at kde.org
Thu Nov 21 16:11:25 UTC 2013
On Thursday 21 November 2013 11:09:22 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> Funny this is the kind of thing that could just be
> avoided if projects stopped using the
> org.kde.kded DBus interface and instead registered
> their own. I for example don't need to do any change
> because I register org.kde.apperd interface so if tomorrow
> I decide to use a stand alone approach for the module
> it won't break everything calling it.
>
> Maybe it would be a good thing to do that for KDED
> modules on 5.
Agreed, that's the plan and what I meant in:
> 2013/11/21 Àlex Fiestas <afiestas at kde.org>:
> > On Wednesday 20 November 2013 20:47:54 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> >> org.kde.kded5 (which we will have to change again but more about that in
> >> a
> >> later email)
Cheers !
More information about the Plasma-devel
mailing list