api review for DataEngineConsumer

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Monday, September 24, 2012 21:09:57 Marco Martin wrote:
> rationale to remove remoteDataEngine

the difference between dataEngine and remoteDataEngine was passing a QUrl for 
the remote engine. it seemed natural to merge the two things. not only does 
this give us just one method in the public API, but it also makes the split 
between local/remote less evident / obvious, which is what should be worked 
towards imho.

> and finishedWithEngine?

this was not in DataEngineConsumer (DEC), as DataEngine usage is tied to the 
lifespan of a given DEC. the idea is to just delete the DEC when you are 
finished with the engines loaded using it.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20120925/fb7c1f21/attachment.sig>