Survey to prepare 'Next Workspace Iteration' sprint

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Monday, June 4, 2012 23:32:08 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Monday, June 04, 2012 11:00:56 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > That might come as a surprise, but
> > 
> > 					Plasma == Active
> > 
> > Making a difference between those (and the KDE workspace) only makes sense
> > in a very limited scope. There's only a technical difference, but as we're
> > explicitely excluding technicalities and focus on vision, just assume
> > they're the same.
> > 
> > 					Workspace == Plasma
> 
> Exactly the point I did before. This is something Plasma team (as in you,
> notmart, ivan, aseigo) think, doesn't mean everybody else does.

so embrace it now that you know it.

instead of saying "well, we didn't know in the past so we can't do it this way 
now" perhaps say "ah, now i see. ok, let's take that into consideration and 
run the sprint in a way that reflects that."

fact is, i've told you that "plasma == active" and "workspace == plasma" many 
times already. here on the mailing list, on irc ... yet you still write as if 
you don't know this, or perhaps that you disagree and would like us to take 
"plasma" and "active" and leave.

can you help me understand why this is?

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20120605/ded30c39/attachment.sig>