Next Iteration Sprint, confirmed !

[Daker Fernandes Pinheiro]

On 04/20/2012 11:33 AM, Dario Freddi wrote:
> Il 20 aprile 2012 15:40, Martin Gräßlin<mgraesslin at kde.org>  ha scritto:
>> On Friday 20 April 2012 15:19:14 Alex Fiestas wrote:
>>> On Friday, April 20, 2012 02:20:58 PM Marco Martin wrote:
>>>> I expressed my concerns before, i'll do it again: i think this is really
>>>> not the time to do it, any good intention and vision is not much use if
>>>> there is not the technical foundation being layd down, and at the moment
>>>> there isn't. i would see this useful a year from now, not now (maybe if
>>>> the goal was 80% programming 20% talking things would be a bit
>>>> different).
>>>> maybe i'm wrong but i'm feeling it's a waste right now.
>>>>
>>>> anyways good luck with it, i hope i'll be proved wrong.
>>> I'm no expert, but the vision should NOT be driven by technology but instead
>>> the other way around, once we have the vision and we have the solution to
>>> implement that vision, then we will have to care about what technology we
>>> have to create/adapt/adopt/etc. Of course since we are developers we will
>>> be doing technical work before vision/solution is finished.
>> +1000 - I think that is really important to first get what we want to achieve
>> and afterwards work on the technology side to get it implemented. And that's a
>> good reason to have the sprint *now* before we have libplasma2 and before we
>> have ported to Wayland.
> I agree 100% with Alex and Martin, and I'll even dare to say that
> coding without planning and without a defined goal is a long standing
> mistake in our workflow which we are trying to fix with this sprint..
>
> Paradoxically, it's exactly *BECAUSE* we need to (re)build a
> foundation that we need to plan a vision. Once you have a well defined
> platform, your vision will be of course limited to what the platform
> can offer. OTOH, this time we have to do things right and start
> planning everything from the beginning, which eventually means having
> the platform built around and for our vision, and not the other way
> round.
I also agree that the vision must be over the limitations, specially 
when the concern is how to prioritize the development.
>
>> Btw I am quite confident that the ideas which will come up will have no impact
>> at all on the current Plasma codebase. What's possible right now can be
>> implemented with QML 1 and everything else just has to wait.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Martin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Plasma-devel mailing list
>> Plasma-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Plasma-devel mailing list
> Plasma-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
>
Cheers,

-- 
Daker Fernandes Pinheiro
http://codecereal.blogspot.com