Opinion on config dialog for QML plasmoids

Thu Aug 18 06:30:47 UTC 2011

On Wednesday, August 17, 2011 22:52:14 Marco Martin wrote:
> i would say ship it (well, after is tested :p)

ok; i'll try and find the time to test it. shouldn't be too hard to do so.

> how does this sound? and does seem feasible enough?

i think so; it keeps backwards compatibility with a path forward for QML. 
being able to not use KConfigDialog in the QML case would also be a win.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20110818/3c6a2d6c/attachment.sig>