plasmate's roadmap

[Mario Fux]

Am Samstag 16 April 2011, 12.07:30 schrieb Sebastian Kügler:
> Hey Aleix,

Morning

> On Friday, April 15, 2011 15:55:22 Aleix Pol wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Sebastian Kügler <sebas at kde.org> wrote:
> > > ... and then still we probably want to move away from QWidget-based
> > > dialogs in Active altogether.
> > > 
> > > For Plasmate, QWidget-based UIs do not play a role, other than that it
> > > will fall back to those where we're lacking suitable apps.
> > > 
> > > More interesting would be to look at lighthouse, and Qt Creator for
> > > parts
> > > which would make hacking QML easier.
> > 
> > I guess it would be good if we can integrate the tools to
> > KDevelop/KDevPlatform somehow, as well.
> > 
> > If we can help you in any way, maybe that would be interesting.
> 
> Yep, maybe we can sit together during BDS to talk about how and where
> kdevelop are overlapping, and how we can join.

Just to remind you're both participants of Randa 2011 ;-).

And to use the opportunity: Sebas, what about the decision of the e.V. board 
about the Randa budget? Poke, poke ;-).

> My gut feeling suggests that we'd be more likely to integrate kdevelop
> pieces into Plasmate (but that's my biased POV probably), since Plasmate
> is very much a workflow-driven tool, so for the purpose of plasmate,
> kdevelop's UI is probably a bad choice. That's not a problem, just
> something we have to keep in mind, Plasmate and KDevelop serve similar
> goals and target groups (maybe comparable to Quanta vs. KDevelop).
> 
> In any case, sharing and collaboration is good. :)
> 
> Cheers,

Cu
Mario