quick note on git and a question

[Martin Gräßlin]

On Wednesday 01 December 2010 21:35:59 Ian Monroe wrote:
> One question I have is, especially in light of the three requested
> repos for kdebase, do we want pre-4.0 history in git? KOffice
> specifically wants their 'deep history', but it might be less useful
> for kdebase due to the huge amount of redesign.
KWin's history dates back to KDE 2 and big parts are largely unchanged for the 
last years. Only major new part is compositing which also dates back to be 
pre-4.0. I just picked one file (client.cpp) and did a git blame and there are 
still lines dating back to 1999 with the last change.

I don't know if it is useful to have this information, but it happened a few 
times that I went through some revisions several years ago.

Would it be possible to include only the full history for the sub-projects 
still present in todays kdebase-workspace (e.g. kwin and kdm)?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20101201/e5c78acc/attachment.sig