Firefox Bookmark runner

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On November 2, 2009, Eduardo Robles Elvira wrote:
> http://github.com/edulix/gsoc/blob/master/kdebase-bookmarks.patch,
> take a look only at the workspace/plasma part of it). In case this new
> bookmarks system ships in, I don't know if mixing the firefox and
> konqueror bookmarks in nepomuk runner would be a good idea? What could
> be the best way in that case?

the nice thing about having the Bookmarks as a separate runner is that we can 
get those returns quicker or slower than other data sets as they get their own 
thread to run in AND people can turn off Bookmarks searching easier when it's 
a separate plugin.

so my question is whether the Nepomuk search runner should really be confined 
to "just" files on disk and other queries for things like Bookmarks be added 
to separate runners (like the existing Bookmarks runner)?

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20091102/d46ec70b/attachment.sig