Firefox Bookmark runner
Eduardo Robles Elvira
edulix at gmail.com
Thu Nov 12 11:51:44 CET 2009
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Aaron J. Seigo <aseigo at kde.org> wrote:
> On November 2, 2009, Eduardo Robles Elvira wrote:
>> http://github.com/edulix/gsoc/blob/master/kdebase-bookmarks.patch,
>> take a look only at the workspace/plasma part of it). In case this new
>> bookmarks system ships in, I don't know if mixing the firefox and
>> konqueror bookmarks in nepomuk runner would be a good idea? What could
>> be the best way in that case?
>
> the nice thing about having the Bookmarks as a separate runner is that we can
> get those returns quicker or slower than other data sets as they get their own
> thread to run in AND people can turn off Bookmarks searching easier when it's
> a separate plugin.
>
> so my question is whether the Nepomuk search runner should really be confined
> to "just" files on disk and other queries for things like Bookmarks be added
> to separate runners (like the existing Bookmarks runner)?
Hi people,
Now, thinking about this again, I wonder: lets say that in the near
future, konqueror bookmarks are directly stored in Nepomuk (which
quite possible). If we put bookmarks in a separate runner.. then both
the Nepomuk runner and the Bookmarks runner will return the same
entries when searching for a given bookmark. How could we deal with
these duplicated entries?
Regards,
Eduardo Robles Elvira.
More information about the Plasma-devel
mailing list