applets descriptions

[Gerhard Gappmeier]

> you're mixing levels of the taxonomy. all Plasmoids are Widgets, but not
> all Widgets are Plasmoids. HTML/CSS can also be Widgets; Google Gadgets are
> Widgets; MacOS X Dashboard Widgets are Widgets, too.

Not sure if I'm mixing it? ;-)
I know that it is possible (or at least should be) to run google gadgets and 
mac os x widgets on Plasma. Put these are also just technical details.

From the user's point of view this should be the same.
So they just run a "plasmoid" or however you want to call it.
Not matter if it's a native C++ plasmoid, a python script
or a Mac OS X Widget that's wrapped to run on Plasma.

But as far as I understood you between your lines you interpret it this way:
Widget: every gadget you can add to the desktop (or to other containers)
Plasmoid: the native C++ widgets

Also the dialog says: "Add Widgets..."
So it seems that this is the term to use, right?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20080904/c3bd93d2/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20080904/c3bd93d2/attachment-0001.sig