[Okular-devel] Fwd: GSoC Proposal Draft

[Albert Astals Cid]

El Dissabte, 20 d'abril de 2013, a les 18:07:20, Jaydeep Solanki va escriure:
> I would go for webkit, because as HTML develops webkit developers will
> improve it where as in QTextDocument case it's not sure that it will come
> up with the latest standards. Or if we try to improve it and maintain it,
> the maintenance load will increase.
> Also I looked at other ePub viewers such as calibre and it too uses webkit.
> 
> I did some tests and webkit seems to be working out of the box.

What do you mean with "some tests"?

> BTW, I had a doubt, as currently every generator gives a QTextDocument, do
> we have to change all of the generators to make it work with webkit, or
> just the specific ePub one ?

What do you think?

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> Cheers,
> Jaydeep
> 
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:
> > El Dijous, 18 d'abril de 2013, a les 23:49:00, Jaydeep Solanki va 
escriure:
> > > Incase my previous mail didn't reach you because of heavy attachment,
> > 
> > here
> > 
> > > is another one.
> > > Hello,
> > > I would be really happy if you can review the proposal that I have
> > 
> > created.
> > 
> > > Proposal link : http://db.tt/7pynIIKN
> > 
> > Looks correct, one way of improving it would be doing some of the
> > preliminary
> > work to see if you'd prefer to go the QTextDocument or the Wekbit route.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> >   Albert
> >   
> > > Thank you.
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Jaydeep Solanki
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Okular-devel mailing list
> > Okular-devel at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel