[Okular-devel] Fwd: GSoC Proposal Draft

[Jaydeep Solanki]

I would go for webkit, because as HTML develops webkit developers will
improve it where as in QTextDocument case it's not sure that it will come
up with the latest standards. Or if we try to improve it and maintain it,
the maintenance load will increase.
Also I looked at other ePub viewers such as calibre and it too uses webkit.

I did some tests and webkit seems to be working out of the box.

BTW, I had a doubt, as currently every generator gives a QTextDocument, do
we have to change all of the generators to make it work with webkit, or
just the specific ePub one ?

Cheers,
Jaydeep


On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:

> El Dijous, 18 d'abril de 2013, a les 23:49:00, Jaydeep Solanki va escriure:
> > Incase my previous mail didn't reach you because of heavy attachment,
> here
> > is another one.
> > Hello,
> > I would be really happy if you can review the proposal that I have
> created.
> > Proposal link : http://db.tt/7pynIIKN
>
> Looks correct, one way of improving it would be doing some of the
> preliminary
> work to see if you'd prefer to go the QTextDocument or the Wekbit route.
>
> Cheers,
>   Albert
>
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jaydeep Solanki
> _______________________________________________
> Okular-devel mailing list
> Okular-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/okular-devel/attachments/20130420/540e1035/attachment.html>