[Nepomuk] RDF Geo vocabulary extensions

[Martin Klapetek]

Is there any update on this?

--
Marty K.



On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 16:05, Sebastian Trueg <strueg at mandriva.com> wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> we are thinking about including the geo ontology into SDO[1] for being
> installed alongside other default ontologies on every linux system.
>
> However, for it to be used in Nepomuk[2] we require an extension. Of
> course we could just put them into a separate ontology but I feel that
> it would be cleaner to have them in the geo onto if at all possible.
>
> The actual extension we need are properly set ranges on the literal
> properties as we treat properties without range definitions as
> "abstract" properties that cannot be set. (On the desktop we need to be
> a little more closed-worldly than on the web)
>
> Is this something you would consider adding to the official ontology?
> And if so would it be possible for us to package a trig'ified version of
> the geo ontology in SDO? What is the licence of the onto?
>
> (by trig'ified I mean that the ontology would be put into its own graph
> accompanied by a metadata graph the way we do with all our ontologies.)
>
> Cheers,
> Sebastian
>
> [1] http://nepomuk.kde.org/
> [2] http://oscaf.sf.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20110905/2b8e1b58/attachment.html>