[Nepomuk] Re: Changing the type of a Nepomuk::Thing?

[Sebastian Trüg]

Hi Chris,

I do not really follow. You want to change the type of a thing but keep
all the contents? This seems totally fine to me.

Cheers
Sebastian

On 02/14/2011 07:26 PM, Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> 
> Another small issue concerning the pimo ontology.
> 
> When I convert an item of the type Nepomuk::Vocabulary::PIMO::Task() to 
> Nepomuk::Vocabulary::PIMO::Note() and I keep the same Nepomuk::Thing, I 
> obviously have to set the new type on the Nepmuk::Thing, right?
> 
> It seems a bit strange since the Nepomuk::Thing I supposed to "represent a 
> uniqe concept/idea". I mean it does make sense somehow since the information 
> stored in the Task/Note is exactly the same, but the semantics change a bit. 
> 
> Anway I have no clue If changing the Thing can have any sideffects.
> 
> It's more that I'm interested, than that I'm facing technical problems =). So 
> far at least ;-)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>