[Nepomuk] Re: Changing the type of a Nepomuk::Thing?

Christian Mollekopf chrigi_1 at fastmail.fm
Tue Feb 22 11:48:32 CET 2011


Hi Sebastian,

what I find a bit strange is that the Thing represents the concept,
but if I change the type from Note to Task the (real world) concept actually 
changes.

However as this doesn't seem to have any sideffects I'll just keep it that way 
=)
Thanks for the answer anyway.

Cheers,

Chris

On Tuesday 22 February 2011 11:24:29 Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> I do not really follow. You want to change the type of a thing but keep
> all the contents? This seems totally fine to me.
> 
> Cheers
> Sebastian
> 
> On 02/14/2011 07:26 PM, Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> > Another small issue concerning the pimo ontology.
> > 
> > When I convert an item of the type Nepomuk::Vocabulary::PIMO::Task() to
> > Nepomuk::Vocabulary::PIMO::Note() and I keep the same Nepomuk::Thing, I
> > obviously have to set the new type on the Nepmuk::Thing, right?
> > 
> > It seems a bit strange since the Nepomuk::Thing I supposed to "represent
> > a uniqe concept/idea". I mean it does make sense somehow since the
> > information stored in the Task/Note is exactly the same, but the
> > semantics change a bit.
> > 
> > Anway I have no clue If changing the Thing can have any sideffects.
> > 
> > It's more that I'm interested, than that I'm facing technical problems
> > =). So far at least ;-)
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Chris
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nepomuk mailing list
> > Nepomuk at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk


More information about the Nepomuk mailing list