Necessitas is NOT ... (consolidating infrastructure)

[Niko Sams]

Ah, I didn't know about that. Thanks for the information.

Niko
Am 18.03.2012 18:05 schrieb "BogDan" <bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com>:

> Hi,
>
> KDE has more then relicense rights, check the document content:
> http://ev.kde.org/resources/FLA-prefab.pdf
> Of course I still have the copyright on my work :)
>
>
> Cheers,
> BogDan.
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >Am 18.03.2012 09:52 schrieb "BogDan" <bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com>:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Actually we are using almost all KDE services:
> >> - wiki (the development plan is there), the lack of man power prevent
> us to move everything to kde wiki from the beginning. Now is a little bit
> difficult to shutdown sf.net and google code. because a lot of people get
> used with them.
> >> - project page (redmine) we are already using it (
> https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/mobile/necessitas)
> >> - mailing list, necessitas primary development is necessitas-devel,
> android-qt is a general mailing list which can not be shutdown because it
> has a lot of members. IMHO is better how it is because necessitas-devel is
> low traffic where the developer can track all the threads.
> >> - dot.kde.org - we are already using it, search for necessitas on it !
> >> - forums - I'm ok with forums.
> >> - planetkde.org - as you may seen, I'm not a great talker and I don't
> have a blog, but it will be great if someone else can do this job !
> >>
> >>   Personally I like bugzilla very much, the problem is that it is to
> complicated for a normal user. I really tried to move bugtracker to kde but
> I received a lot of negative feedback e.g. why do I have to create another
> account there (sf.net can use openid), why do I have to tell you if my
> distro is rpm or deb based, or if I install it from sources, etc. You see
> these questions are not useful for necessitas project, and I don't know if
> KDE sysadmins can remove them *ONLY* for Necessitas project
> >>
> >> "and not just have a cheap download server" sound like we
> take advantage of KDE, which is not the case !
> >It's perfectly Ok to just use the download server! I just would like to
> have everything at one place, like most other kde projects do.
> >
> >>
> >> KDE e.v. owns the copyright for *ALL* *MY* code that is hosted on their
> servers !
> >I doubt that. Usually you just give KDE eV the right to release your code
> under a later (L)GPL version, and the developers still have their own
> copyright on it.
> >
> >Niko
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/necessitas-devel/attachments/20120318/a2ac763c/attachment.html>