Necessitas is NOT ... (consolidating infrastructure)

[BogDan]

Hi,

KDE has more then relicense rights, check the document content: http://ev.kde.org/resources/FLA-prefab.pdf
Of course I still have the copyright on my work :)


Cheers,
BogDan.


> 
>
>
>Am 18.03.2012 09:52 schrieb "BogDan" <bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Actually we are using almost all KDE services:
>> - wiki (the development plan is there), the lack of man power prevent us to move everything to kde wiki from the beginning. Now is a little bit difficult to shutdown sf.net and google code. because a lot of people get used with them.
>> - project page (redmine) we are already using it (https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/mobile/necessitas)
>> - mailing list, necessitas primary development is necessitas-devel, android-qt is a general mailing list which can not be shutdown because it has a lot of members. IMHO is better how it is because necessitas-devel is low traffic where the developer can track all the threads. 
>> - dot.kde.org - we are already using it, search for necessitas on it ! 
>> - forums - I'm ok with forums.
>> - planetkde.org - as you may seen, I'm not a great talker and I don't have a blog, but it will be great if someone else can do this job !
>>
>>   Personally I like bugzilla very much, the problem is that it is to complicated for a normal user. I really tried to move bugtracker to kde but I received a lot of negative feedback e.g. why do I have to create another account there (sf.net can use openid), why do I have to tell you if my distro is rpm or deb based, or if I install it from sources, etc. You see these questions are not useful for necessitas project, and I don't know if KDE sysadmins can remove them *ONLY* for Necessitas project
>>
>> "and not just have a cheap download server" sound like we take advantage of KDE, which is not the case !
>It's perfectly Ok to just use the download server! I just would like to have everything at one place, like most other kde projects do.
>
>>
>> KDE e.v. owns the copyright for *ALL* *MY* code that is hosted on their servers !
>I doubt that. Usually you just give KDE eV the right to release your code under a later (L)GPL version, and the developers still have their own copyright on it.
>
>Niko
>
>