Necessitas is NOT ... (consolidating infrastructure)
BogDan Vatra
taipanromania at gmail.com
Sun Mar 18 13:17:04 UTC 2012
Only the open bugs ! :)
În data de 18 martie 2012, 15:13, Marco Bernasocchi
<marco at bernawebdesign.ch> a scris:
> Marco Bernasocchi (mobile)
> http://opengis.ch
> On Mar 18, 2012 8:38 AM, "BogDan" <bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Only the open !
> What do you mean?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> BogDan.
>>
>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Marco Bernasocchi <marco at bernawebdesign.ch>;
>> To: BogDan <bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com>;
>> Cc: necessitas-devel at kde.org <necessitas-devel at kde.org>;
>> Subject: Re: Necessitas is NOT ... (consolidating infrastructure)
>> Sent: Sat, Mar 17, 2012 10:01:45 PM
>>
>> On 03/17/2012 10:06 PM, BogDan wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >>>>> Nobody wanted to do it! I can't do everything by myself !
>> >>>> I can maybe do some of it, but don't we want to move all to
>> >>>> http://community.kde.org/Necessitas and eventually shut down the sf
>> >>>> page?
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> It's up to you ! The problem is that currently the sf.net home page is
>> >>> used by too may users to shut down it immediately, also it has an easier and
>> >>> better bugtracker than KDE and google code, so, IMHO it will be wise to keep
>> >>> them both and to use sf.net page as primary until we get something better,
>> >>> but as I said, in the end is up to you !
>> >> Ok, then lets stick to SF, and lets try to shut down the other
>> >> bugtrackers. Kde bt has only 5 bugs and google has only few more. Is it ok
>> >> if i duplicate them to SF?
>> >
>> > Yes, please !!!
>> Is it enough to copy only the open bugs? or shall I copy all?
>> >
>> >> As well, can i get edit rights for sf? Im mbernasocchi.
>> >
>> > Done, please check if you have enough rights !
>> >
>> looks ok
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> [...]
>> >>>>> - 1 bug tracker on sourceforge and 1 on google code - it was
>> >>>>> discuss
>> >>>>> many times before, ONLY bug tracker on sourceforge should be used.
>> >>>> We could just hide the issue tracker tab at:
>> >>>> http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/adminTabs
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I know that feature, I didn't had enough time to move the remaining
>> >>> bug to sf.net ...
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> and what about
>> >>>> https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas
>> >>>
>> >>> I wanted to use it as primary bugtracker, but is too complicated for
>> >>> normal users, so I decide to stick with sf.net until we find a better
>> >>> solution.
>> >>>
>> >>> [...]
>> >>>>> - The ONLY solution was to "force" contributors to release their
>> >>>> code
>> >>>>> under BSD or public domain.
>> >>>> So you are saying that using reviewboard is the way to force
>> >>>> contributors to
>> >>>> "BSD or public domain" their code so it is "legally"
>> >>>> impossible to use pull reguests from gitourious?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Sadly, it is legally impossible!. Otherwise we can't upstream it !
>> >>>
>> >>> I'll try again to convince qt-project to host android qt port on their
>> >>> servers, this way all these problems will disappear. I hope this time to
>> >>> have more success.
>> >> Super
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> BogDan.
>> >> Ciao
>> >>
>> >> On Mar 17, 2012 9:41 PM, "BogDan"<bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> [...]
>> >>>>> Nobody wanted to do it! I can't do everything by myself !
>> >>>> I can maybe do some of it, but don't we want to move all to
>> >>>> http://community.kde.org/Necessitas and eventually shut down the sf
>> >>>> page?
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> It's up to you ! The problem is that currently the sf.net home page is
>> >>> used by too may users to shut down it immediately, also it has an easier and
>> >>> better bugtracker than KDE and google code, so, IMHO it will be wise to keep
>> >>> them both and to use sf.net page as primary until we get something better,
>> >>> but as I said, in the end is up to you !
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> [...]
>> >>>>> - 1 bug tracker on sourceforge and 1 on google code - it was
>> >>>>> discuss
>> >>>>> many times before, ONLY bug tracker on sourceforge should be used.
>> >>>> We could just hide the issue tracker tab at:
>> >>>> http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/adminTabs
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I know that feature, I didn't had enough time to move the remaining
>> >>> bug to sf.net ...
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> and what about
>> >>>> https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas
>> >>>
>> >>> I wanted to use it as primary bugtracker, but is too complicated for
>> >>> normal users, so I decide to stick with sf.net until we find a better
>> >>> solution.
>> >>>
>> >>> [...]
>> >>>>> - The ONLY solution was to "force" contributors to release their
>> >>>> code
>> >>>>> under BSD or public domain.
>> >>>> So you are saying that using reviewboard is the way to force
>> >>>> contributors to
>> >>>> "BSD or public domain" their code so it is "legally"
>> >>>> impossible to use pull reguests from gitourious?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Sadly, it is legally impossible!. Otherwise we can't upstream it !
>> >>>
>> >>> I'll try again to convince qt-project to host android qt port on their
>> >>> servers, this way all these problems will disappear. I hope this time to
>> >>> have more success.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> BogDan.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marco Bernasocchi
>> www.opengis.ch
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Necessitas-devel mailing list
> Necessitas-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/necessitas-devel
>
More information about the Necessitas-devel
mailing list