Necessitas is NOT ... (consolidating infrastructure)

Marco Bernasocchi marco at bernawebdesign.ch
Sun Mar 18 13:13:10 UTC 2012


Marco Bernasocchi (mobile)
http://opengis.ch
On Mar 18, 2012 8:38 AM, "BogDan" <bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Only the open !
What do you mean?
>
> Cheers,
> BogDan.
>
> Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Marco Bernasocchi <marco at bernawebdesign.ch>;
> To: BogDan <bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com>;
> Cc: necessitas-devel at kde.org <necessitas-devel at kde.org>;
> Subject: Re: Necessitas is NOT ... (consolidating infrastructure)
> Sent: Sat, Mar 17, 2012 10:01:45 PM
>
> On 03/17/2012 10:06 PM, BogDan wrote:
> > [...]
> >>>>>  Nobody wanted to do it! I can't do everything by myself !
> >>>> I can maybe do some of it, but don't we want to move all to
> >>>> http://community.kde.org/Necessitas and eventually shut down the sf
page?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> It's up to you ! The problem is that currently the sf.net home page
is used by too may users to shut down it immediately, also it has an easier
and better bugtracker than KDE and google code, so, IMHO it will be wise to
keep them both and to use sf.net page as primary until we get something
better, but as I said, in the end is up to you !
> >> Ok, then lets stick to SF, and lets try to shut down the other
bugtrackers. Kde bt has only 5 bugs and google has only few more. Is it ok
if i duplicate them to SF?
> >
> > Yes, please !!!
> Is it enough to copy only the open bugs? or shall I copy all?
> >
> >> As well, can i get edit rights for sf? Im mbernasocchi.
> >
> > Done, please check if you have enough rights !
> >
> looks ok
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>>>  - 1 bug tracker on sourceforge and 1 on google code - it was
discuss
> >>>>>  many times before, ONLY bug tracker on sourceforge should be used.
> >>>> We could just hide the issue tracker tab at:
> >>>> http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/adminTabs
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I know that feature, I didn't had enough time to move the remaining
bug to sf.net ...
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> and what about
https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas
> >>>
> >>> I wanted to use it as primary bugtracker, but is too complicated for
normal users, so I decide to stick with sf.net until we find a better
solution.
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>>>  - The ONLY solution was to "force" contributors to release their
> >>>> code
> >>>>>  under BSD or public domain.
> >>>> So you are saying that using reviewboard is the way to force
contributors to
> >>>> "BSD or public domain" their code so it is "legally"
> >>>> impossible to use pull reguests from gitourious?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sadly, it is legally impossible!. Otherwise we can't upstream it !
> >>>
> >>> I'll try again to convince qt-project to host android qt port on
their servers, this way all these problems will disappear. I hope this time
to have more success.
> >> Super
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> BogDan.
> >> Ciao
> >>
> >> On Mar 17, 2012 9:41 PM, "BogDan"<bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com>  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>>>  Nobody wanted to do it! I can't do everything by myself !
> >>>> I can maybe do some of it, but don't we want to move all to
> >>>> http://community.kde.org/Necessitas and eventually shut down the sf
page?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> It's up to you ! The problem is that currently the sf.net home page
is used by too may users to shut down it immediately, also it has an easier
and better bugtracker than KDE and google code, so, IMHO it will be wise to
keep them both and to use sf.net page as primary until we get something
better, but as I said, in the end is up to you !
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>>>  - 1 bug tracker on sourceforge and 1 on google code - it was
discuss
> >>>>>  many times before, ONLY bug tracker on sourceforge should be used.
> >>>> We could just hide the issue tracker tab at:
> >>>> http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/adminTabs
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I know that feature, I didn't had enough time to move the remaining
bug to sf.net ...
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> and what about
https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas
> >>>
> >>> I wanted to use it as primary bugtracker, but is too complicated for
normal users, so I decide to stick with sf.net until we find a better
solution.
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>>>  - The ONLY solution was to "force" contributors to release their
> >>>> code
> >>>>>  under BSD or public domain.
> >>>> So you are saying that using reviewboard is the way to force
contributors to
> >>>> "BSD or public domain" their code so it is "legally"
> >>>> impossible to use pull reguests from gitourious?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sadly, it is legally impossible!. Otherwise we can't upstream it !
> >>>
> >>> I'll try again to convince qt-project to host android qt port on
their servers, this way all these problems will disappear. I hope this time
to have more success.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> BogDan.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
> Marco Bernasocchi
> www.opengis.ch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/necessitas-devel/attachments/20120318/96d769b8/attachment.html>


More information about the Necessitas-devel mailing list