barth.netterfield at gmail.com
Fri Apr 30 04:22:28 CEST 2010
Not sure for a criterion. There are a few regressions left that I have to
get into bugzilla.
-GSL fits is important
-There is an X based memory leak that has popped up that I need to track
-Improved auto layout
-Some more stuff I can't remember off hand.
Let shoot for June 1 or no show-stoppers, which ever comes later.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Peter Kümmel <syntheticpp at gmx.net> wrote:
> Fine! I also realized that we are already at beta5,
> beta2 was only the last release with windows binaries.
> And what should be the criterion to release 2.0.0?
> No show stoppers after releasing beta5? And how long
> should we wait?
> Barth Netterfield wrote:
> > I think we should!
> > C. Barth Netterfield
> > University of Toronto
> > 416-845-0946
> > On Apr 29, 2010 7:05 PM, "Peter Kümmel" <syntheticpp at gmx.net> wrote:
> > Looking at bugzilla shows that there are no critical bugs any more:
> > Only http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235050 which maybe only happens
> > very slow Windows systems.
> > And it seems the memory leaks on Windows are also fixed.
> > So shouldn't we release a new beta?
> > Peter
> Kst mailing list
> Kst at kde.org
C. Barth Netterfield
University of Toronto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Kst