[Kst] beta3
Peter Kümmel
syntheticpp at gmx.net
Fri Apr 30 01:36:18 CEST 2010
Fine! I also realized that we are already at beta5,
beta2 was only the last release with windows binaries.
And what should be the criterion to release 2.0.0?
No show stoppers after releasing beta5? And how long
should we wait?
Peter
Barth Netterfield wrote:
> I think we should!
>
> C. Barth Netterfield
> University of Toronto
> 416-845-0946
>
> On Apr 29, 2010 7:05 PM, "Peter Kümmel" <syntheticpp at gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Looking at bugzilla shows that there are no critical bugs any more:
>
> http://bugs.kde.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=kst&version=unspecified&version=svn-trunk&version=2.0.0&version=2.0.0_devel&version=2.0.0_beta4&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=NEEDSINFO&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_severity=critical&bug_severity=grave&bug_severity=major&bug_severity=crash&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=minor&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&columnlist=bug_severity%2Cpriority%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cresolution%2Cversion%2Cop_sys%2Cshort_desc&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
>
> Only http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235050 which maybe only happens on
> very slow Windows systems.
> And it seems the memory leaks on Windows are also fixed.
> So shouldn't we release a new beta?
>
> Peter
More information about the Kst
mailing list