[Kroupware] Re: kroupware_branch: kdepim/korganizer
Cornelius Schumacher
kroupware@mail.kde.org
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:03:30 +0100
On Thursday 07 November 2002 12:03, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 November 2002 22:03, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
>
> > It would be even
> > better, if a common GUI for both cases could be used.
>
> I tend to disagree here.
> The GUI should be as specific to the task as possible.
Is it really so hard to make a GUI that works for one attendee as well as for
multiple attendees?
KDE is mostly about standard applications which are useful to a large group of
users. For the kroupware project it might be better to have more specialised
GUIs, but I don't think we should remove features from KOrganizer because of
that.
> > One assignee is
> > only a special case of multiple attendees and as iCalendar allows
> > multiple attendees for a todo I think KOrganizer has to support that.
>
> Just because iCalender supports this does not mean you have to nessessarily
> agree with that or support it in your own code.
KOrganizer aims at being a iCalendar compliant application. If it can't handle
a file conforming to the standard this is bad. What happens, if you read a
todo with multiple attendees with the kroupware interpretation of todos? What
happens, if the user edits it or removes the attendee?
> For tasks I don't think that group assignments are a good idea right now.
I don't know if there aren't users which make use of this feature.
--
Cornelius Schumacher <schumacher@kde.org>