[Kmymoney-devel] work on models

[Thomas Baumgart]

On Monday 15 February 2010 20:58:04 Alvaro Soliverez wrote:
> 2010/2/15 Cristian Oneţ <onet.cristian at gmail.com>:
> > În data de Luni 15 Februarie 2010 21:36:12 Alvaro Soliverez a scris:
> >> I do not have a preference in either case to go one way or the other.
> >> What I would not like to see, is that some areas of the code have one
> >> format and the rest has another.
> >> In matters of format, I prefer to keep diversity out. :)
> >
> > I totally agree with you on this. I just saw the models as a separate
> > module and I thought that we could have a naming convention, uniform for
> > the models module, without the overhead of a prefix.
>
> Good point, but I wouldn't like this module to end like reports, which
> is very different in some respects from the rest of the code, and that
> makes it harder to maintain.

We can probably make that discussion part of the finance sprint. After all, I 
do see the current MyMoneyXX classes and maybe the models as well as part of 
a common code base. So we should have a common understanding with the other 
apps.

> It should follow whatever naming convention we have for the rest of the
> app.
>
> <dreaming>I'll fix reports when I have the time</dreaming>

-- 

Regards

Thomas Baumgart

GPG-FP: E55E D592 F45F 116B 8429   4F99 9C59 DB40 B75D D3BA
-------------------------------------------------------------
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 224 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kmymoney-devel/attachments/20100216/bcca8247/attachment-0001.sig