Rewriting Flow & formulashape for 3.0? (Re: Qt5 Port Status)

[Yue Liu]

I agree we should port first then add new things, I'll drop ownership of
formulashape for now and continue working on libmathview.

For Flow it's just a kopageapp wrapper and a docker plugin that works in
all calligra apps, so the "re-write" actually means to move the plugin code
from Flow folder to Karbon folder, then fix all paths in cmake files,
#include lines, and identity strings in code. I can finish that before
releasing 3.0.

Cheers,
Yue

2015-04-08 14:16 GMT-07:00 Boudewijn Rempt <boud at valdyas.org>:

> As for me, I would say:
>
> * let's not already remove code until we're releasing 3.0. Just keep it
> UNPORTED -- otherwise, we'll get merge conflicts because of translations,
> if nothing else.
>
> * As for whether we should keep the formula shape or not, I think it's
> simple: if it hasn't been ported by 3.0 release time, we won't keep it.
> Otherwise, we will: and then we can replace it if there's an alternative.
>
>
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Inge Wallin wrote:
>
>  On Wednesday, April 08, 2015 22:07:46 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Yue,
>>>
>>> good to see that you among other things have already turned Karbon back
>>> to
>>> life in the Qt5/KF5 spheres :) Rock on!
>>>
>>> Now, the plan for Calligra 3.0 was to focus on porting all code to Qt5
>>> and
>>> KF5.
>>>
>>> No refactoring or rewriting should be done ideally, as that will only
>>> complicate things, like history (including Calligra's) teaches.
>>> One step at a time, they say surely in many languages.
>>>
>>> With KoReport, KoProperty, CalligraDB we are breaking this initial idea
>>> that
>>> we informally agreed on, makes me not that happy, would have like to work
>>> on Plan porting already now, and also am slightly fearing how much things
>>> changed with those libs. But at least it seems things are getting ready
>>> almost in time now... not yet git-cloned the repos, but soon will do.
>>>
>>> Seems you, Yue, want to do more for 3.0 as well, let me comment on that
>>> please:
>>>
>>> Am Samstag, 21. März 2015, 20:02:32 schrieb Yue Liu:
>>> > I want to add something to the "Stuff that can be removed" part of the
>>> > porting plan.
>>> > > plugins/formulashape/ - I will write a new formula plugin based on
>>> > libmathview.
>>>
>>> How broken is the current shape?
>>>
>>
>> I would really not like to remove the formula shape until there actually
>> *is* a replacement, not just a promise to create one.  I don't care how
>> much the current shape sucks (well, actually I do, but work with me here).
>> But even if interaction sucks, visualization sucks and other things suck,
>> it still provides a roundtrip storage for formula objects.
>>
>> And if *that* fails, it should be fixed immediately and not removed. I
>> worked on the formulashape myself not too long ago and I know that it has
>> worked before.
>>
>> The same goes for the Flow application to some extent, but since the
>> formula shape is shared between all apps it is very important that it not
>> be destroyed now.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> calligra-devel mailing list
>> calligra-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> calligra-devel mailing list
> calligra-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20150409/bb7bd42d/attachment.html>