Krita 2.4 on Windows: pros and cons

Sven Langkamp sven.langkamp at gmail.com
Wed Jul 20 20:48:50 CEST 2011


On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:42 PM, John Culleton <john at wexfordpress.com>wrote:

> **
>
> On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 07:45:55 am silvio grosso wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
>
> >
>
> > Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
>
> > > I also think that gimp/windows problems are more of a social problem
>
> >
>
> > I totally agree :-)
>
> >
>
> > Windows users are usually very different from Linux Users :-)
>
>  As I understand it Krita is totally dependent on KDE and won't run
> without it. If this is true, will not a port to Windows require a port of
> some or all of KDE, Qt4, etc.?
>

That is already done.


>  If this is false, and Krita can be compiled separately from KDE, where is
> the source code? When I inquired earlier I was told to download all of KDE
> and compile that
>

On windows you really need to compile everything unless you use the
installer.


>  Actually I would like to see a 2.0 user manual or tutorial as a priority
> objective. You feed your family first. Windows users like the rest of us
> will hunger for a manual.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20110720/faad6316/attachment.htm 


More information about the kimageshop mailing list