Photographic features and other non-paint features)

[Peter Smyth]

Hi All,

I'm a bit tentative diving in here, as I'm not a developer and haven't been
able to use Krita since v1.6 (no time to compile/setup/debug and Debian
testing is still on v1.6).

I'll just say that I'm sad to see Krita move away from being a program that
has photo editing capabilities, it is why I started using it in the first
place.  I liked the idea of a lightweight native Linux alternative to
Photoshop, The Gimp wasn't, and still isn't, it.

I'm not asking you to change this course, but be aware some will miss that
focus.

Cheers

Peter

On 2 March 2010 20:40, LukasT.dev at gmail.com <lukast.dev at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday 02 March 2010 10:22:04 Michael Thaler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > No, it's not just that: it's that these filters don't fit the vision of
> a
> > > high-end painting application. Emboss has useful properties, which is
> > > probably why Cyrille put a question mark next to them. Raindrops and
> > > oilpaint would be much nicer if implemented as brushes instead of
> > > filters, probably as part of the deform brush. That way, the result
> will
> > > be dependent upon the artistic skill of the user and different from
> > > artist to artist instead of mostly similar.
> >
> > This makes sense. Actually integrating the raindrop effect in the deform
> > brush sounds like a fun idea. If nobody else wants to do it, I will have
> a
> > look at it.
>
> I wrote deform brush so I will review your patch then.
>
> _______________________________________________
> kimageshop mailing list
> kimageshop at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kimageshop/attachments/20100302/524df23a/attachment.htm