Photographic features and other non-paint features)

LukasT.dev@gmail.com lukast.dev at gmail.com
Tue Mar 2 10:40:36 CET 2010


On Tuesday 02 March 2010 10:22:04 Michael Thaler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > No, it's not just that: it's that these filters don't fit the vision of a
> > high-end painting application. Emboss has useful properties, which is
> > probably why Cyrille put a question mark next to them. Raindrops and
> > oilpaint would be much nicer if implemented as brushes instead of
> > filters, probably as part of the deform brush. That way, the result will
> > be dependent upon the artistic skill of the user and different from
> > artist to artist instead of mostly similar.
> 
> This makes sense. Actually integrating the raindrop effect in the deform
> brush sounds like a fun idea. If nobody else wants to do it, I will have a
> look at it.

I wrote deform brush so I will review your patch then. 



More information about the kimageshop mailing list