Autolayer merge done

[Casper Boemann]

On Saturday 15 January 2005 21:29, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> On Saturday 15 January 2005 20:32, Michael Thaler wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 January 2005 20:17, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > > At the moment extent() returns the width and height of a tile.
> > > Shouldn't that be the width and height of the paintdevice?
> >
> > I don't think that it returns the size of a tile. I did the following:
> >
> > void KisFilterInvert::process(KisPaintDeviceSP src, KisPaintDeviceSP dst,
> > KisFilterConfiguration* /*config*/, const QRect& rect, KisTileCommand*
> > ktc) {
> >  Q_INT32 x, y, w, h;
> >         src->extent(x,y,w,h);
> >         kdDebug() << "x: " << x << " y:" << y << " w:" << w << " h:" << h
> > << "\n";
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > Opening a 1600 x 1200 image gives:
> >
> > krita: x: 0 y:0 w:1600 h:1216
> >
> > Opening a 692 x 689 image gives:
> >
> > krita: x: 0 y:0 w:704 h:704
>
> Try to open a new image than you will get 64x64.
>
> The problem is: When you create a new image, there is only one tile and the
> datamanager will create more if you paint something.
> I currently using the new iterators and extent in the gradient painter.
> Before start painting the gradient, I get height and width. As there is
> only one tile in the image, the resulting gradient is only as big as the
> tile. _______________________________________________
> kimageshop mailing list
> kimageshop at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop

Just returned.

In that case using the extent is the wrong thing. Use the image dimensions 
instead. Or is that a problem ?

To the rest of you: In my mind the extent is to allow filtering on a 
paintdevice that has already been painted in some manner.
-- 
mvh
Casper Boemann