Changing the default channel depth

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Monday 08 March 2004 13:27, Patrick Julien wrote:

> Maybe, but I would rather lose definition from scans then lose developers
> because the API is to hard to use or too error prone.  Period.

Let's give it a try -- we can set QUANTUM to 32, and see what happens...

> Not only, but from what scanners?  Or am I missing something here.  We
> already do scans using the kde libraries, or whatever it's called.  It
> doesn't support passing in of 64 bit values.


-- 
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi