[kgraphviewer-devel] Preparing a release

[Sandro Andrade]

Hey guys,

Yes, I'm following this thread even though in "read-only mode".
KGraphviewer kpart it's fine for my demands in KDevelop control flow
graph plugin.

Millian, I've talked to Gael some weeks ago (I wasn't in mailing list
at that time) about
some refactoring in KGraphViewer to implement a Qt Model to support
the graphs as
an abstract interface, allowing concrete implementations for different
graph formats,
and a new Qt View for rendering such information. We can discuss about that if
you guys agree it's an interesting refactoring for a future release.

Anyway, releasing KGraphviewer now it's great because I will be moving
control flow
graph for review soon.

Cheers,
Sandro

On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Milian Wolff <mail at milianw.de> wrote:
> On Saturday 24 April 2010 17:35:25 Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>> yes we do.    =) ( I'm the 'other guy' )
>
> Hehe exactly. Sorry :P
>
>> just sometimes too busy to respond ( akademy - br last week, flisol this
>> week ) but I'm reading everything.
>
> Ok cool, I'd really appreciate any kind of feedback. I'm in a bit of hurry
> this weekend though.
>
>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Milian Wolff <mail at milianw.de> wrote:
>> > On Saturday 24 April 2010 10:50:39 Gaël (aka Kleag) wrote:
>> >> On Friday 23 April 2010 11:23:49 Milian Wolff wrote:
>> >> > Gaël (aka Kleag), 23.04.2010:
>> >> > > On Thursday 22 April 2010 14:46:34 Milian Wolff wrote:
>> >> > > > Gaël (aka Kleag), 22.04.2010:
>> >> > > > > Hello,
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > As noted by some of you, one of the things to do for
>> >> > > > > kgraphviewer is to prepare a release.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > What do you think should be done before doing this release ? Is
>> >> > > > > there some missing or incomplete feature to implement before
>> >> > > > > releasing ? Maybe the final replacement of the external dot
>> >> > > > > process by the graphviz library ?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > I'd welcome that. And furthermore I'd like to get more feedback on
>> >> > > > my interface. We shouldn't provide ABI compatibility for the
>> >> > > > first release, but should come up with a working interface
>> >> > > > anyways...
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Concerning, the interface, don't you think that most of the part
>> >> > > slots should be available through the interface, like addNewNode or
>> >> > > removeNode ? Otherwise what would be the right criterion to include
>> >> > > a feature in the interface or not ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes, good point. As long as the signals are pure virtual members (not
>> >> > signals) in the interface, they can be easily overwritten by slots in
>> >> > the actual implementation. That's also what's done in e.g. the
>> >> > KTextEditor interfaces.
>> >>
>> >> Yes. Do you want to do it ?
>> >>
>> >> But, in the class definition, they are called "slotXyz", and it would be
>> >> strange in an interface to have such names. "xyz" would be more natural.
>> >> What do you think ?
>> >
>> > full ack. The slot... stuff should be removed. I'll see whether I can get
>> > around to do it.
>> >
>> > Other question: Do you know whether sandroandrade + one other guy read
>> > this list now? We could need more feedback from them...
>> >
>> >> > > > > I have started to set up a suse build service to be able to
>> >> > > > > produce packages for several Linux distributions when the
>> >> > > > > release will be ready.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Cool. But imo there are packagers for many repos out there who'd
>> >> > > > help you here, at least we from kdevelop don't do any custom
>> >> > > > packaging...
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Yes, you're right. And kgv is already packaged by several distros,
>> >> > > but that can allow to give a compatibility with current and
>> >> > > previous distros versions.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > Simply announce on kde-packagers or how that ML was called.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I did not know this kde-packagers list... I'll try to remember. I
>> >> > > don't understand what you mean by "or how that ML was called." ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Well, is it really kde-packagers at kde.org or was it
>> >> > something-else at kde.org
>> >> >
>> >> > :)
>> >>
>> >> Oh, yes, I see. I'm sometimes a little bit "slow" when reading English.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Milian Wolff
>> > mail at milianw.de
>> > http://milianw.de
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > kgraphviewer-devel mailing list
>> > kgraphviewer-devel at kde.org
>> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kgraphviewer-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kgraphviewer-devel mailing list
>> kgraphviewer-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kgraphviewer-devel
>
> --
> Milian Wolff
> mail at milianw.de
> http://milianw.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> kgraphviewer-devel mailing list
> kgraphviewer-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kgraphviewer-devel
>
>