[kgraphviewer-devel] Preparing a release

Milian Wolff mail at milianw.de
Sat Apr 24 19:21:12 CEST 2010


On Saturday 24 April 2010 17:35:25 Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> yes we do.    =) ( I'm the 'other guy' )

Hehe exactly. Sorry :P

> just sometimes too busy to respond ( akademy - br last week, flisol this
> week ) but I'm reading everything.
 
Ok cool, I'd really appreciate any kind of feedback. I'm in a bit of hurry 
this weekend though. 

> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Milian Wolff <mail at milianw.de> wrote:
> > On Saturday 24 April 2010 10:50:39 Gaël (aka Kleag) wrote:
> >> On Friday 23 April 2010 11:23:49 Milian Wolff wrote:
> >> > Gaël (aka Kleag), 23.04.2010:
> >> > > On Thursday 22 April 2010 14:46:34 Milian Wolff wrote:
> >> > > > Gaël (aka Kleag), 22.04.2010:
> >> > > > > Hello,
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > As noted by some of you, one of the things to do for
> >> > > > > kgraphviewer is to prepare a release.
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > What do you think should be done before doing this release ? Is
> >> > > > > there some missing or incomplete feature to implement before
> >> > > > > releasing ? Maybe the final replacement of the external dot
> >> > > > > process by the graphviz library ?
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > I'd welcome that. And furthermore I'd like to get more feedback on
> >> > > > my interface. We shouldn't provide ABI compatibility for the
> >> > > > first release, but should come up with a working interface
> >> > > > anyways...
> >> > > 
> >> > > Concerning, the interface, don't you think that most of the part
> >> > > slots should be available through the interface, like addNewNode or
> >> > > removeNode ? Otherwise what would be the right criterion to include
> >> > > a feature in the interface or not ?
> >> > 
> >> > Yes, good point. As long as the signals are pure virtual members (not
> >> > signals) in the interface, they can be easily overwritten by slots in
> >> > the actual implementation. That's also what's done in e.g. the
> >> > KTextEditor interfaces.
> >> 
> >> Yes. Do you want to do it ?
> >> 
> >> But, in the class definition, they are called "slotXyz", and it would be
> >> strange in an interface to have such names. "xyz" would be more natural.
> >> What do you think ?
> > 
> > full ack. The slot... stuff should be removed. I'll see whether I can get
> > around to do it.
> > 
> > Other question: Do you know whether sandroandrade + one other guy read
> > this list now? We could need more feedback from them...
> > 
> >> > > > > I have started to set up a suse build service to be able to
> >> > > > > produce packages for several Linux distributions when the
> >> > > > > release will be ready.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Cool. But imo there are packagers for many repos out there who'd
> >> > > > help you here, at least we from kdevelop don't do any custom
> >> > > > packaging...
> >> > > 
> >> > > Yes, you're right. And kgv is already packaged by several distros,
> >> > > but that can allow to give a compatibility with current and
> >> > > previous distros versions.
> >> > > 
> >> > > > Simply announce on kde-packagers or how that ML was called.
> >> > > 
> >> > > I did not know this kde-packagers list... I'll try to remember. I
> >> > > don't understand what you mean by "or how that ML was called." ?
> >> > 
> >> > Well, is it really kde-packagers at kde.org or was it
> >> > something-else at kde.org
> >> > 
> >> > :)
> >> 
> >> Oh, yes, I see. I'm sometimes a little bit "slow" when reading English.
> > 
> > --
> > Milian Wolff
> > mail at milianw.de
> > http://milianw.de
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > kgraphviewer-devel mailing list
> > kgraphviewer-devel at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kgraphviewer-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kgraphviewer-devel mailing list
> kgraphviewer-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kgraphviewer-devel
 
-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kgraphviewer-devel/attachments/20100424/6c3e1459/attachment.sig 


More information about the kgraphviewer-devel mailing list