Ajax in konqueror
Rigo Wenning
rigo at w3.org
Sun Nov 30 23:19:07 GMT 2008
Hi Alan,
faking has a price as faking browser entry gives statistics on browser
usage that are not close to reality, which in turn gives you less
arguments in the HTML5 debate, which in turn is a pity as it forces
you into the follower approach, creating more browser specific and
sucky versions. All exemplified by Opera's bork version...
I won't comment on "implementing Ajax"...
*sigh*
Rigo
On Saturday 29 November 2008, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> Unless we implement all features and all bugs of one of those
> browsers and lie to the web-site about who we are, we will always
> get the sucky version. Typically pretending to be safari or
> firefox, will make konqueror work much better on such sites though,
> as a buggy firefox version of those websites are better than their
> sucky versions.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://mail.kde.org/mailman/private/kfm-devel/attachments/20081201/6a52912f/attachment.sig>
More information about the kfm-devel
mailing list