tabbed browsing bugs

[Doug Hanley]

On Monday 22 April 2002 03:36 am, David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 21 April 2002 00:39, Doug Hanley wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 April 2002 03:45 am, David Faure wrote:
> > > On Saturday 20 April 2002 00:00, Doug Hanley wrote:
> > > > Also, when doing view-follows-view, only honor views that are visible
> > > > (literally using view->isVisible() to test).
> > >
> > > Possibly (I don't remember a isVisible() method, must be new ;)
> >
> > well, its view->frame()->isVisible() to be precise
> >
> > BTW, David, do you think I should make new profiles that explicitly
> > support tabs, such as webbrowsing-tabs and filemanagement-tabs?
>
> I don't see why some profiles should support tabs and some shouldn't.
> IIRC you implemented tabs in a way that requires them to be mentionned
> in the profile, but from a user point of view, why should I be unable to
> use tabs in some cases? Some profiles might not come up with tabs
> initially, but I might want to create one while using it....

Hmm.. I just thought of something.  I think it might be best to keep the idea 
that George Staikos had (use the active view if there is no docContainer), 
and improve it a little.  We could put in code that makes the highest level 
view or container that is not passive the docContainer upon loading a 
profile.

Yeah, I think I'll try it... sorry about the disturbance.

-- Doug Hanley