windows version, form builders

[esp5 at rama.comp.pge.com]

On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:31:15AM +0200, Sylvain Gelly wrote:
> > > Argh. I was hoping to avoid Visual Studio, and definitely hoping to
> > > avoid
> > > VC++...
> 
> > If you want this to be a serious, i.e. commericial) application, then
> > there is no way around native compilers, you may try Borland but gcc
> > with cygwin is insufficient.
> 
> 	Hello, I am not a professional, but I have a project which is totally 
> developed on Kdevelop on linux, and which is maintained on windows. I can 
> give you my experience : avoid VC++ !! The compiler doesn't understand a lot 
> of things (for example in the templates). But it is quite simple to use 
> Borland tools. We develop on linux with kdevelop, and we have very simple 
> scripts  which create firstable a .pro (with qmake) and after a Makefile for 
> borland (qmake again), and finally compile the project on windows (with 
> borland's make). All works very fine, no #ifdefs at all, no manual actions to 
> do.
> 	I things it is a good solution, because it minimise the work to maintain the 

hmm. could you possibly forward the scripts? I'd find it easier to grok if I was
looking through what the scripts do, and if possible reuse them...

Ed

-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«