Fw: Status on the kUML project.

[Tarjei Knapstad]

On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Darius Stachow wrote:

> Hi Tarjei,
>
Hey Darius.

I've taken the liberty of forwarding this to the KDevelop list as well.
Hope that's ok.

> I've posted your mail in our mailing list. Gerard Flynn has sent an answer
> (at the bottom of this mail)
>
> I still haven't found the time to write you a mail with my comments on this
> topic.
> I'm sorry for that :-( But I will do it asap.
>
No problem, I've got a shitload to do at work these days myself. Which
also means I haven't gotten around to do any work on KDevelop yet, as my
life is currently reduced to the good ole' work-eat-sleep :(

Original discussion follows:
============================
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gerard Flynn" <gerard.flynn at free.fr>
> To: <kuml-devel at barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 8:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: Status on the kUML project.
>
>
> > Darius GMX wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >here is a message I've got from one of the kdevelop peoples two days ago.
> > >
> > >They are planning to integrate an UML tool into kdevelop.
> > >
> > >Feel free to send them your two cents on this topic.I'll send them a mail
> > >tomorrow.
> > >The editor for kuml still need more work. But maybe they can utilize the
> > >library component of kuml (if it reached a state of being usable) for
> > >kdevelop for the beginning.
> > >
> > >In my opinion it would be much better to integrate a full CASE tool into
> > >kdevelop, not just an simple UML painter like kivio.
> > >
> > >___________________________
> > >Darius Stachow, Germany/Hamburg
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Tarjei Knapstad" <tarjeik at chemcon.no>
> > >To: <stacho_d at informatik.fh-hamburg.de>
> > >Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:00 AM
> > >Subject: Status on the kUML project.
> > >
> > >
> > >>Hi Darius.
> > >>
> > >>The KDevelop team is planning on integrating an UML editor into the
> Gideon
> > >>(3.0) release. Currently the choice stands between Kivio and kUML.
> > >>
> > >>>>From your web pages kUML seems to have kept a low activity level for
> the
> > >>last year. Are you still working on it? In which state is the CVS code?
> > >>Will you continue working on it? In short: What's your status? :)
> > >>
> > >>Have a nice weekend mate!
> > >>
> > >>Cheers,
> > >>--
> > >>Tarjei Knapstad, MSc
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >     Well my Reflective MOF implementation is certainly still quite far
> > >from being able to provide a UML backend. I do have a Reflective
> > repository running but it's perfectly useless without a specific MOF
> > implementation for the meta-objects, so my next step is auto-generating
> > that.
> >
> >     I think that Chris' implementation must be much further along.
> >
> >     In the past I've wondered about the possibility of making a UML
> > plugin for kivio that could use the kUML backend, perhaps this could be
> > the opportunity to do that ?  What is the timeframe for kdevelop 3.0 ?
> >
> >     Gerard
>
>
>

-- 
Tarjei Knapstad, MSc
Head of Software Development

ChemCon AS
Professor Brochs vei 6
7030 Trondheim

Phone: +47 73 54 03 73
tarjei at chemcon.no


-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«