Java IDE support within KDevelop..?

[Roberto Alsina]

To close the JBuilder debate (which I am actually sorry I contributed to):

Those extra 64MB make a hell of a lot of a difference.

As for whether my life is hectic or not, that's entirely my own business.

On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, OS wrote:

> I am going to jump to the defense of JBuilder here ! My 128Mb Celery 400 runs
> JBuilder quite nicely really. Considering it is running on Sun JDK 1.2.2
> release candidate 2, and is completely written in Java (so I understand) I
> think the speed is quite admirable really. (Try running a Java app. under
> Windows and see why it is called Windoze !!!). JBuilder takes about 11 - 12
> second to start up with the active project, Kdevelop about 5 - 6 (from fresh,
> with no caching !). 6 seconds ! Boy, you're life must be really hectic !
> 
> Leave poor old JBuilder alone, at least it runs on Linux and the Foundation
> version is free.
> 
> It you system is making scary noises try some Three in One !
> 
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, you wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Benoit Cerrina wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > you can't say that KDevelop is a speed demon either.
> > > Actually this is why most of the work I do on KDevelop is to improve the
> > > performences.
> > 
> > You have not seen JBuilder in my otherwise speedy 64MB Celeron 350 :-)
> > KDevelop opens instantly, and opens medium-sized projects in seconds,
> > while JBuilder will, well, make scary noises at me :-)

 ("\''/").__..-''"`-. .         Roberto Alsina
 `9_ 9  )   `-. (    ).`-._.`)  ralsina at unl.edu.ar
 (_Y_.)' ._   ) `._`.  " -.-'   Centro de Telematica
  _..`-'_..-_/ /-'_.'           Universidad Nacional del Litoral
(l)-'' ((i).' ((!.'             Santa Fe - Argentina
                                KDE Developer (MFCH)
Not mad, but bound more than a madman is (Romeo and Juliet, Act I Scene II)