KDevelop 1.0 beta 3 & Qt ver 2.0.2

[OS]

Thanks, I am calm(er) now !!!

I'll keep persisting. Either I'm a glutten for punishment, I like a challenge,
or I beleive that Kdevelop is worth pursuing. I'll leave you to decide which
must be true !

Owen

On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, you wrote:
> Hey OS, calm down, ok ?
> 
> Maybe some nice guy out there can provide you with a statically linked version
> of kdevelop ?
> 
> - holger
> 
> Ralf Nolden <Ralf.Nolden at post.rwth-aachen.de> on 17/10/99 22:58:52
> 
> Please respond to kdevelop at barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
> 
> To:   kdevelop at barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: KDevelop 1.0 beta 3 & Qt ver 2.0.2
> 
> 
> 
> 
> OS wrote:
> >
> > To be frank, I am at the point of giving up with Kdevelop and start waiting
> for
> > the Borland tools sometime next year !!! I am begining to beleive that all
> > these success stories are made up !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> 
> a) KDevelop is still beta because of quarrels like yours
> b) we can't ensure it works on all and every platform, specifically the
> libraries are a critical point where the user has to take care of.
> 
> So, when you would use a distribution that includes kdevelop, you can be
> sure that it runs perfect ;-)
> 
> Ralf