D11291: Do not add return type to constructors declaration when editing definition in signature assistant.

[Sven Brauch]

brauch accepted this revision.
brauch added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.


  Looks good to me, thanks!

INLINE COMMENTS

> apol wrote in adaptsignatureassistant.cpp:59
> Only need to lock here, no? Or at least after the if.

Yeah but the macro is not a lock, just an assert. If you expect the function to be called with the lock, it IMO makes sense to put it on the top.

REPOSITORY
  R32 KDevelop

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D11291

To: shashwatdixit, kfunk, mwolff, #kdevelop, brauch
Cc: brauch, apol, #kdevelop, kdevelop-devel, antismap, iodelay, vbspam, njensen, geetamc, Pilzschaf, akshaydeo, surgenight, arrowdodger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20180313/90da5277/attachment.html>