Broken categories in our templates or kapptemplate?

Milian Wolff mail at milianw.de
Thu Aug 23 15:14:14 UTC 2012


On Thursday 23 August 2012 15:17:46 Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I was just trying to create a new Qt/C++ CMake project but was kinda
> > confused by the categories presented to me. The left-most list was:
> > 
> > Python, Ruby, C++, KDE, Standard
> > 
> > Naturally I chose C++ but that only has KDE (i.e. real KDE stuff, like
> > plasma, KApplication etc.) and and qmake templates.
> > 
> > I then checked Standard and KDE since the other two categories are
> > clearly not what I want. Standard has only a C++/Terminal with CMake.
> > Interestingly the KDE entry does not have a single KDE-related
> > template, all of the three are CMake/C++ Qt templates - one for tests,
> > one for gui and one for non-gui apps.
> > 
> > Now before I whip up a bugreport:
> > 
> > Is this categorization intentional as outlined above?
> > 
> > Should the categories in KDevelop or kapptemplate be changed? (I'd
> > personally fix the kdevelop templates to use the language as first
> > option too)
> > 
> > --
> > KDevelop-devel mailing list
> > KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> > https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
> 
> What KDE SDK version do you have? this changed some time ago...
> 
> The reasoning behind was that it's more clear to have what you're
> trying to achieve in the topmost level so that you can get all the
> options on how to do it in the end.

Also note that this dialog will look a bit nicer once Miha's GSOC branch is 
merged, see:

http://noughmad.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/kdevelop-project-assistant.png

Cheers
-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20120823/462870d4/attachment.sig>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list