Broken categories in our templates or kapptemplate?

[Aleix Pol]

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just trying to create a new Qt/C++ CMake project but was kinda
> confused by the categories presented to me. The left-most list was:
>
> Python, Ruby, C++, KDE, Standard
>
> Naturally I chose C++ but that only has KDE (i.e. real KDE stuff, like
> plasma, KApplication etc.) and and qmake templates.
>
> I then checked Standard and KDE since the other two categories are
> clearly not what I want. Standard has only a C++/Terminal with CMake.
> Interestingly the KDE entry does not have a single KDE-related
> template, all of the three are CMake/C++ Qt templates - one for tests,
> one for gui and one for non-gui apps.
>
> Now before I whip up a bugreport:
>
> Is this categorization intentional as outlined above?
>
> Should the categories in KDevelop or kapptemplate be changed? (I'd
> personally fix the kdevelop templates to use the language as first
> option too)
>
> --
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel

What KDE SDK version do you have? this changed some time ago...

The reasoning behind was that it's more clear to have what you're
trying to achieve in the topmost level so that you can get all the
options on how to do it in the end.

Aleix