Review Request: Parser support for C99 designated initializers
Alexandre Courbot
gnurou at gmail.com
Thu Apr 12 13:30:03 UTC 2012
> On April 10, 2012, 8:22 a.m., Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > Still not good unfortunately, the new parseDesignatedInitializer() causes a parse error on constructs like this:
> >
> > #include <Qt/qstring.h>
> >
> > void foo(const QString &s);
> > QString bar();
> >
> > void f() {
> > foo( bar() + " " );
> > QString command;
> > }
> >
> > Here the "QString command" line will raise a parser error (parses perfectly without this patch). Slightly changing the above line (like removing the parentheses on bar(), or changing the '+' to a ',' fixes it. Crazy.
>
> Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> I've somewhat refactored the patch, it passes given testcases and this QString testcase without parse errors.
> Could you provide the testcase which makes the original patch enter an infinite loop?
I do not have a testcase, but this happened when loading KDevplatform and KDevelop. After closing from 100% the background parser would eat all your memory. Could you provide the source of your updated version?
- Alexandre
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103448/#review12286
-----------------------------------------------------------
On April 10, 2012, 6:17 a.m., Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103448/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated April 10, 2012, 6:17 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDevelop and Milian Wolff.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Parser support for C99 designated initializers
>
> Support C99 initializers in the C++ parser, e.g:
>
> struct foo_t foo = {
> .has_cake = true,
> .nb_candles = 12,
> };
>
> int bar[10] = {
> [1] = 15,
> [9] = 25,
> };
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> languages/cpp/parser/parser.h 64b5c505866ac2a0ed847aa67e4c7809df3af6b5
> languages/cpp/parser/parser.cpp a45ee31a1207d56efef292babb2e774b51378ead
> languages/cpp/parser/tests/test_parser.h 2869d9ddae2632aced2f2e2fa966382da3a0082d
> languages/cpp/parser/tests/test_parser.cpp 94e3ee06dc9187568c000dcdd8baf8d87d1d06e6
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103448/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Used it for a couple of weeks, ensured the parser tests all pass.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexandre Courbot
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20120412/5f770143/attachment.html>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list