Automake patch
David Nolden
zwabel at googlemail.com
Sat Feb 26 21:21:39 UTC 2011
I haven't found this requirement in the GPL while searching in it for a few
minutes.
However there should at least be a "Copyright (C) unknown author from
KDevelop forum, 2011" in the header, because it must be clear that the other
listed copyright-holders are not enough to change the licence of the file to
something else.
However, this is anyway only required if the patch has a sufficient weight.
If it just renames a few function-calls in obvious ways due to API changes,
then it might not even be worth the copyright.
Am 26.02.2011 20:46 schrieb "Nicolás Alvarez" <nicolas.alvarez at gmail.com>:
On 26/02/2011, David Nolden <david.nolden.kdevelop at art-master.de> wrote:
> Since it's GPL, the autho...
Of course it matters; the GPL forces you to still give credit to the author.
--
Nicolas
--
KDevelop-devel mailing list
KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailma...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20110226/f133797c/attachment.html>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list