kdevelop provider

[Aleix Pol]

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:

> On 11.10.10 01:06:48, Aleix Pol wrote:
> > Hi guys.
> > I'd like to remove the kdeprovider plugin from KDevelop 4.1 because now
> KDE
> > is going to move into git.kde.org and all url's are going to be messed
> up
> > and I don't think it's worth it to have it broken in a couple of months,
> so
> > I'd prefer to release a properly working version for 4.2 when
> > http://projects.kde.org is ready.
> >
> > The main reason of this email (besides notifying you that I'm going to
> > remove it) is that I'm not sure the best way to go. Should I just remove
> it
> > from 4.1, merge to master and revert the change? (I want to have it on
> > master for sure).
>
> I'm not sure how good an idea that really is. Looking at the current
> state of conversion rules I'm not convinced that the main modules will
> move within the next 4 months. Things might be a bit better for
> extragear apps (or not as there's even less devs on them). Not to
> mention that there's still no clear-cut-decision on split vs. monolithic
> repos...
>
> So IMHO it would make sense to ship kdeprovider supporting svn in
> KDevelop 4.1 and ship a plugin supporting both svn+git in 4.2. Its your
> decision of course ;)
>
> Andreas
>
> --
> Generosity and perfection are your everlasting goals.
>
> --
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>

Really? I thought they were just waiting to move the directories... Blog
posts about git.kde.org sounded very optimistic to me :P I was just dragged
into the general hype.

I guess then the best will be to stay like this then.

Aleix
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20101011/2ef796cc/attachment.html>