Review Request: Check for possible unloading of version control plugin in ProjectPrivate.
Floris Ruijter
flo.ruijt at hotmail.com
Fri Dec 24 02:05:21 UTC 2010
> On 2010-12-23 23:27:03, Floris Ruijter wrote:
> > i'd say it should be a shared pointer, since the plugin will now be almost immediately after the assignment be deleted, since weakpointer has no assignment from T* so it is assigned a coerced T* to sharedpointer, wich will delete the contents afterwards (very soon) then you have quite some lines down a use of the data() member which is not a member of weakpointer, but is of sharedpointer.
i was looking at the wrong manual version. looking at the new manual one can see nothing's wrong
- Floris
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100225/#review605
-----------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-12-21 13:05:24, Dmitry Risenberg wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100225/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2010-12-21 13:05:24)
>
>
> Review request for KDevelop and Aleix Pol Gonzalez.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> Store a QWeakPointer to version control plugin in ProjectPrivate, so that it can track deletion.
> No checking for FileManager unloading, because it seems to be a mandatory plugin.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> shell/project.cpp c8fbc53
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100225/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dmitry
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20101224/665ac1fd/attachment.html>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list