kdevelop-pg and kdevelop-pg-qt

Matt Rogers mattr at kde.org
Tue Aug 11 16:21:51 UTC 2009


On Tuesday 11 August 2009 02:52:01 am Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 10.08.09 20:59:49, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > Is there a reason why kdevelop-pg and kdevelop-pg-qt haven't been
> > released?
> 
> Nobody cared for a release, they're only used for stuff you have to
> build from trunk/ currently anyway. And that stuff is usually optional
> even
> 
> > Does one supersede the other?
> 
> kdevelop-pg-qt "was" just a port to Qt types (instead of stl), but got
> quite some fixes/enhancements since then. kdevelop-pg hasn't been
> touched since ages.
> 
> > Does anybody care if I spin 0.1 releases of one or both of these?
> 
> Feel free to do so, might even cause the distro's to pick it up if we
> make the usage non-optional.
> 
> > Does anybody also care if I make them compile within the larger context
> > of playground/devtools rather than having to compile them standalone?
> 
> As long as this doesn't sacrifice the existing CMakeLists.txt files
> in kdevelop-pg-qt. (I don't care too much about the non-qt version)
> 
> Andreas
> 

Is there anybody left using the stl version? If not, I'll just remove it.
-- 
Matt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20090811/b4eafbc2/attachment.sig>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list